Every week we hear the same question: "I have €500 a month for ads, where should I spend it?" Here is the honest, benchmark-backed answer most agencies will not give you because it does not justify their fee.

The intent gap

Google ads catch people who are actively searching: "pizza near me", "hairdresser open Sunday", "best optician 75011". Intent is high, conversion is fast, distance is short. Meta ads interrupt people scrolling: intent is zero, but you can be visually striking and creative.

 OokloMeta
Cost per click€0.40-1.20€0.15-0.50
Cost per visit€2-6€8-20
Time to first sale<24h5-30 days
Best forNow-buyersFuture buyers
Setup time30 min2-3h

When Meta actually wins

  • You sell something visual: food, fashion, beauty, decor.
  • You're launching a new product or location and need awareness fast.
  • Your customers are 18-35 and on Instagram daily.
  • You have great photo or video content: bad creative kills Meta ads.

When Google is the obvious choice

  • You're an "emergency" business: locksmith, plumber, dentist, vet.
  • Your service is searched, not browsed: optician, accountant, garage.
  • You're competing with chains for the same neighbourhood searches.
  • You don't have the time to make 4 new creatives per month.
€4.20
avg. cost per visit on Google for restaurants
€11.80
avg. cost per visit on Meta for the same
63%
of local ad budgets misallocated, per 2025 BCG study

The mistake that wastes 50% of small budgets

Geographic targeting set too wide. "France" is a death sentence for a €500 budget. Even "Paris" is too broad. Your radius should match where 80% of customers live: usually 1-3km. Tighten this and your effective spend doubles overnight.

"We were spending €800/month on Meta with terrible results. Switched 70% to Google with a 1.5km radius: same budget, 3x the visits."

— Léa, florist, Nantes